This document from the
vendor’s website explains how the pressure switch and booster fan fit into the scheme. It’s installed where I’ve pointed the arrow in the diagram below. Its intent is to overcome the high pressure loss associated with the ducting that goes to the individual workstations. Without it there might not be (depending on the duct configuration) much air pulled from those locations.
Balancing this system is going to be difficult. It appears that the vendor sends the same booster fan with all installations, but every installation will have different requirements to get proper airflow. Also, to do this properly, the ducting wouldn’t be designed as shown in the diagram below, where the first station will have much higher suction than stations downstream. The concept of collecting the fumes coming off the chemicals used in nail salons at their source before they are inhaled is good, but getting the correct airflow at each workstation requires thoughtful design in the ductwork and correct specification of the booster fan(s). I’m also fairly confident that the HRV/ERV manufacturer would deny a warranty claim if they were to learn what chemical fumes their unit was being used to exhaust.
I think that the business model for this vendor has “dubious technical merit”. It seems that they have a nice website that caters to the mostly non-technically-literate people who run salons, but in the end they just ship a few off-the-shelf components with a probable hefty markup over what they paid for them.
View attachment 717787
[/QUOTE
This document from the
vendor’s website explains how the pressure switch and booster fan fit into the scheme. It’s installed where I’ve pointed the arrow in the diagram below. Its intent is to overcome the high pressure loss associated with the ducting that goes to the individual workstations. Without it there might not be (depending on the duct configuration) much air pulled from those locations.
Balancing this system is going to be difficult. It appears that the vendor sends the same booster fan with all installations, but every installation will have different requirements to get proper airflow. Also, to do this properly, the ducting wouldn’t be designed as shown in the diagram below, where the first station will have much higher suction than stations downstream. The concept of collecting the fumes coming off the chemicals used in nail salons at their source before they are inhaled is good, but getting the correct airflow at each workstation requires thoughtful design in the ductwork and correct specification of the booster fan(s). I’m also fairly confident that the HRV/ERV manufacturer would deny a warranty claim if they were to learn what chemical fumes their unit was being used to exhaust.
I think that the business model for this vendor has “dubious technical merit”. It seems that they have a nice website that caters to the mostly non-technically-literate people who run salons, but in the end they just ship a few off-the-shelf components with a probable hefty markup over what they paid for them.
View attachment 717787
Thank you so much I’m learning a lot. I definitely got “ripped off” but I guess I will work with what I got. Lesson learned. So based on the diaphragm it looks like the air pressure switch is mounted on to the supply air ductwork, and there will be a wire that will be connecting from the switch onto the booster fan which will be connecting to the exhaust ductwork correct?