Generator & Interlock Kit – Float the Neutral?
I had a Square D interlock kit (UL listed) installed by an electrician to my main service panel in October, along with an inlet box (240 Volts) to allow me to plug in an external generator. Not long after, I bought a portable generator.
The portable generator (6700 watts) has a bonded neutral and GFCI protection on the 120 V outlets, but no GFCI protection on the 240 V / 30 amp outlets.
I connect it to the inlet with a 40-foot, 30 Amp cord.
I have since been told two opposite things:
1) Some have said that I should unbond the neutral at the generator to avoid the risk of shock from a parallel path and for code compliance (I don’t need an inspection here).
2) I have also been told that unbonding the neutral at the generator creates a greater risk, in case the generator develops a fault caused by an internal component failure, and it is not at that time connected to the house inlet via the 40-foot, 30-amp cord. Those with the second opinion (all claiming to be electricians on internet boards) have said that the risk of a shock at the generator from a parallel path caused by bonding at the generator and at the service panel is miniscule.
I don’t plan to use the generator as a stand-alone unit, but instead for emergency power. However, you never know, so I’m reluctant to have the neutral unbonded. Even though it will be used primarily (or more likely exclusively) for emergency power, we will often start it without the 30-amp cord plugged in to the house, for monthly testing. The cord will only be plugged in when we need to connect to the house.
I have the generator set up so it is completely protected from the elements - it will never be exposed to rain or snow.
If I leave the neutral bonded, is there much of a risk of shock due to the double bonded neutral at the generator (which is upstream from the main panel)?
The power company has a bonded neutral upstream from my house when they are supplying potentially a zillion watts.
In tests, the generator powers everything I need it to run properly, and without tripping any GFCI’s.
Both my dryer and range have neutral bonds, due to the age of my house, by the way, although my main service panel is now brand new. We have never had a problem with shocks from these devices, or any electrical problems with our service, but a generator may not be the same animal.
I had a Square D interlock kit (UL listed) installed by an electrician to my main service panel in October, along with an inlet box (240 Volts) to allow me to plug in an external generator. Not long after, I bought a portable generator.
The portable generator (6700 watts) has a bonded neutral and GFCI protection on the 120 V outlets, but no GFCI protection on the 240 V / 30 amp outlets.
I connect it to the inlet with a 40-foot, 30 Amp cord.
I have since been told two opposite things:
1) Some have said that I should unbond the neutral at the generator to avoid the risk of shock from a parallel path and for code compliance (I don’t need an inspection here).
2) I have also been told that unbonding the neutral at the generator creates a greater risk, in case the generator develops a fault caused by an internal component failure, and it is not at that time connected to the house inlet via the 40-foot, 30-amp cord. Those with the second opinion (all claiming to be electricians on internet boards) have said that the risk of a shock at the generator from a parallel path caused by bonding at the generator and at the service panel is miniscule.
I don’t plan to use the generator as a stand-alone unit, but instead for emergency power. However, you never know, so I’m reluctant to have the neutral unbonded. Even though it will be used primarily (or more likely exclusively) for emergency power, we will often start it without the 30-amp cord plugged in to the house, for monthly testing. The cord will only be plugged in when we need to connect to the house.
I have the generator set up so it is completely protected from the elements - it will never be exposed to rain or snow.
If I leave the neutral bonded, is there much of a risk of shock due to the double bonded neutral at the generator (which is upstream from the main panel)?
The power company has a bonded neutral upstream from my house when they are supplying potentially a zillion watts.
In tests, the generator powers everything I need it to run properly, and without tripping any GFCI’s.
Both my dryer and range have neutral bonds, due to the age of my house, by the way, although my main service panel is now brand new. We have never had a problem with shocks from these devices, or any electrical problems with our service, but a generator may not be the same animal.