Joewho - you're making it sound like if I just buck up and drop some extra cash, get the 2 part, and 'do it right', I'll be set.
I want the 2 part stuff, I like it a MILLION times better, I've already said that. The problem is that, even with good brand 2 part epoxies, they still have obscene failure rates!!!! That's the point I'm trying so hard to impress here and I don't think it's coming across right.
I want the look of the 2 part stuff, I want the flakes in the finish lol.
The problem is not one of cash, it's one of convenience. For me to do a 2 part and hope, pray, that my job happens to be the rare one that surpasses a 1 or 2 year window before it starts coming up, just seems foolish.
Whereas with this 1 part stuff, I already know and expect it will have failure spots, but the beauty is that I just get a few extra gallons, and do touchups as necessary - it's not the same as a 2 part in that respect and that's why I'm doing this.
2 parts and 1 parts have ridiculous failure rates. I've heard that many companies DO NOT even do the 2 part epoxy stuff anymore for customers because of the high failure rate. So, even if I do my best, I'm not going to fool myself to thinking I'm close to the level of experience as a professional. I have to accept there's a good chance of failure on any of these systems except tile, and the cost for tile is pointless for my garage.
So, knowing there's a high rate of failure, it seems I'll have a better looking garage by just doign occasional touchups with my 1 part approach, like I'm professing here, as opposed to a 2part approach, where in a year I have big failure spots all over and cannot do anything about it, deal with it, and finally just do the whole floor again. That just seems pointless and way more of a headache than quickly doing a clean/paint every few months on the high traffic areas with this 1 part stuff.
I feel like people are highly disagreeing with my approach and, in all honesty, I just don't understand your reasons why. This isn't a dollars thing (well, the tiles are more than I want to spend, but as far as paint/coatings it's not about the dollars). I can get the kit for a 2 part for my 1 car garage for very cheap (relatively speaking of course). I'm not trying to go cheap and save some cash here, I'm thinking long term. I know both systems will have high failure rates. However, a failure on a 1part, where I still have a gallon on hand, means a quick touchup. A failure on a 2 part means, basically, deal with the failure until you're fed up and decide to redo the entire thing.
Am I missing something? In my head this seems like, by far, the most logical approach for me. I'm not doing this to save cash or anything, it's just that this seems a smarter approach in the long run. If someone who is disagreeing with me in this thread could provide a more thorough explanation of why you feel my approach isn't the best I'd love to hear it, because I'm new at this stuff and want my jobs to come out as good as I can get them too, but no matter how I think of this the 1part with touchups as needed seems to be the best solution available for me.