No reason you can't do that as long as you are OK with having a panel exposed in each room and maintain minimum clearance both width and in front of the panels. Also, you can't simply add up 50 amps of service to each room. You have to consider the total capacity of the feeding panel and your service. Of course you'd never, realistically speaking, draw anywhere that current in any room, not even in the kitchen and laundry so what you're saying is pretty pointless.
There are smart things that can be done to adjust to our modern electric world. I just replaced my main panel with a generator ready panel and, while I was at it, I rewired most of the house. In key areas, I just made sure that outlets were on two different breakers to not exceed maximum outlets per circuit. I have outlets on one circuit at each nightstand and a separate circuit in the middle under the headboard for plugging in an electric blanket. All of the accessible outlets are dual-duplex (4 outlets) because we always use more plugs these days for wall warts and I wanted hard-wired outlets as much as possible rather than outlet strips all over the house. Now I have plenty of outlets for TVs, DVD players, cable boxes, phone chargers, lamps, laptops, and alarm clocks as well as a few left over for whatever else may come up in the future. All of those devices draw such ridiculously low power that total use on any of those circuits probably never exceeds 1 amp. Those are examples of what, in my opinion, are smart changes in how we view electricity in the home. Just adding panels in every room doesn't offer the same kind of benefit.
I did the same thing at the desk area. Outlets under the desk and just at desktop height, again on multiple circuits and, again, plenty of them. Same thing at my network and telecomm panel area except that everything there is on a single circuit with battery and inverter backup. Still, lots of outlets, but not lots of amps; it's just not required.