Hello,
I've got a 1927 bungalow that needs some chimney work, but I'm getting conflicting advice from different masonry contractors. The chimney mortar is badly eroded and you can see what looks like mortar from a previous repointing job popping out in places. In other places, you can't even see the mortar when looking up from the ground level because it is worn away so much. Fortunately, the chimney is fairly massive (it contains two flues) and I think that has given it enough bulk to stay straight despite failing mortar. But it needs attention somewhat urgently.
My problem is that one masonry contractor recommends rebuilding the chimney from the roofline up (same brick) and repointing below the roofline, whereas another contractor recommends repointing instead of rebuilding.
The contractor recommending a rebuild says that repointing is not a good idea because you have to grind away old mortar until you get to good mortar for the repointing to take well. They assert that you'd grind away all the old mortar without finding any that is solid enough to use as a base for repointing, so a rebuild is the way to go. They also pointed out that it has been repointed at least once already and you can see that mortar popping out from moisture getting behind it and freezing. They think all the mortar is just crumbly and has to go.
The contractor advocating a repoint says that if you grind away enough of the old mortar and replace with new, you'll have enough good mortar to hold the chimney up even if the mortar towards the inside of the chimney is not replaced. They say they'll be replacing a very high percentage of the mortar, so the chimney will be very solid and secure. They also said that the most important thing after repairing the chimney is to apply a sealant on the chimney to protect it, reapplying every few years.
Any masonry experts on here who can clear up the confusion? The bid to rebuild the chimney is a good deal more expensive than the bid to repoint, as you would guess. Will either route yield good results, or should I pay more for the rebuild to be on the safe side? I plan to stay in the house a long time, so doing the job right if not extravagantly is my goal. Also, any opinions on applying sealant to the chimney and how frequently it is merited? I did some research and even found some sources saying you shouldn't seal it all. So many opinions it is hard to decide!
Thanks!
I've got a 1927 bungalow that needs some chimney work, but I'm getting conflicting advice from different masonry contractors. The chimney mortar is badly eroded and you can see what looks like mortar from a previous repointing job popping out in places. In other places, you can't even see the mortar when looking up from the ground level because it is worn away so much. Fortunately, the chimney is fairly massive (it contains two flues) and I think that has given it enough bulk to stay straight despite failing mortar. But it needs attention somewhat urgently.
My problem is that one masonry contractor recommends rebuilding the chimney from the roofline up (same brick) and repointing below the roofline, whereas another contractor recommends repointing instead of rebuilding.
The contractor recommending a rebuild says that repointing is not a good idea because you have to grind away old mortar until you get to good mortar for the repointing to take well. They assert that you'd grind away all the old mortar without finding any that is solid enough to use as a base for repointing, so a rebuild is the way to go. They also pointed out that it has been repointed at least once already and you can see that mortar popping out from moisture getting behind it and freezing. They think all the mortar is just crumbly and has to go.
The contractor advocating a repoint says that if you grind away enough of the old mortar and replace with new, you'll have enough good mortar to hold the chimney up even if the mortar towards the inside of the chimney is not replaced. They say they'll be replacing a very high percentage of the mortar, so the chimney will be very solid and secure. They also said that the most important thing after repairing the chimney is to apply a sealant on the chimney to protect it, reapplying every few years.
Any masonry experts on here who can clear up the confusion? The bid to rebuild the chimney is a good deal more expensive than the bid to repoint, as you would guess. Will either route yield good results, or should I pay more for the rebuild to be on the safe side? I plan to stay in the house a long time, so doing the job right if not extravagantly is my goal. Also, any opinions on applying sealant to the chimney and how frequently it is merited? I did some research and even found some sources saying you shouldn't seal it all. So many opinions it is hard to decide!
Thanks!