You mean "owed back the
withholding".
The withholding is YOUR MONEY.
It doesn't become tax until you file your 1040 in April.
Look. Let's suppose I take a job that pays $3000/month, and I get $500 of tax withheld, so I'm taking home $2500. However I quit after 4 months, and don't work the rest of the year so my annual income is $12,000 and my withholding is $2000. The tax on $12,000 income is zero.
Now to you "cash accounting" guys, your wage was $2500 and life is unfair, and you assume the other $500 is lost to the IRS. But I think in "accrual accounting". That $500 is
mine, and it's simply in an
MY account at the IRS. IRS took it because they thought I would need it to pay my taxes in April, but they were wrong. It's still my money and I go get it back! And I get a $2000 refund that year.
However, there is this rather annoying "Service to Property Charge" of now about $1.00 per day which will go up to "$1.20 next month.
As it will cost me $438 annually just to be connected to the "grid" - even if I did not "use" any electricity - it would take about 16 years or more to "break even" on an $8000 investment, and I may not live so long (although I will try to do so.)
Yeah, that's where they getcha. Historically they just built distribution costs into the per-KWH costs and nobody worried about it.
But given how new technologies are reshaping the grid (solar, EVs, batteries) it is creating a lot of absurd insanities. Suppose you have a town where half the electricity cost is for maintenance of the distribution wires.
- House #1 has net-zero solar. Generates $100 of power onto the grid, imports $100 of power from the grid, net cost is $0 ($0 to maintain wires).
- House #2 has inefficient A/C and electric heat, pays $200/month ($100 to maintain wires).
- House #3 is a passive solar vacation home that uses a miserly $20/month of power ($10 to maintain wires).
- House #4 is built from the ground up to be battery/off-grid. It has no service drop, but the distribution is available at edge-of-property if he ever changes his mind.
Moving power doesn't actually cause wear or tear on the wires,
the cost of maintaining wires is exactly the same no matter how much power you take. So how do we divide the cost of wire maintenance FAIRLY? Right now house #2 is paying for all of it. House #3 is leeching. House #4, I don't know what they're doing, how do you charge them for a service they Do Not Want? House #1 is a free rider, but a fair exchange since they fronted the money for the solar generation, which the town benefits from.
These are hard problems.
So more and more, towns and power companies are moving to "charge you for the service drop" and then "charge you (less) for the electricity". One town I know charges
for the right to have a service drop, so they screw property #4 good and plenty. And if your property has 2 service drops, you pay twice.