First off, I want to thank all the experienced DIYers, and especially the pros who post to this board. I've spent quite a bit of time here already, searching topics and following threads. I'm impressed by the consistently clear and thorough answers, and the patience shown by everyone giving them.
My first question is simple (I think.)
The PO of my home installed a high pressure sodium security light on the detached garage. It lights things up well enough, but isn't my idea of "garden lighting." (IMO, these lights are more suited to barnyards and truck stops.. but that's just MO.)
I'd like to replace it with a photocell-controlled, dual floodlight fixture with PAR 38 CFLs. (Still not mood lighting... but a little less harsh and a bit more energy efficient.)
The current HPS light is mounted to the stucco wall, under the eaves, and is fed via an MC cable that passes through an appx 1/2" hole in the stucco, behind the light.
I usually like to do the cleanest install possible, but the stucco on the garage is 3/4" to 1" thick, and the inside is not accessible, so I'd like to avoid cutting a hole in the stucco and trying to install an internal JB.
The quicker (and a little dirtier) solution I see is to install an external "bell box" on the stucco wall, and attach the fixture to that.
I'd like to re-use the existing MC, if I can. Since the hole behind behind the box won't be big enough for cable + clamp, I'd like to attach the cable to the box by threading a clamp to the inside of the box. I'd then apply a ring of caulk to the wall, around the hole the cable passes through, before mounting the box.
From what I can find in the NEC (2008) this seems OK as long as I allow the equivalent of one conductor for box fill (for the internal clamp), and as long as everything is protected from the entry of moisture.
Since the box is under the eaves and is fully sealed except for where the MC enters, and I plan to seal that with caulk, it would appear to me that I've satisfied the requirements for such an installation in a damp location.
(NEC doesn't seem to be too specific on exactly how moisture should be excluded, unless I've missed something.)
Does anybody see anything wrong with any of this?
Thanks again!
My first question is simple (I think.)
The PO of my home installed a high pressure sodium security light on the detached garage. It lights things up well enough, but isn't my idea of "garden lighting." (IMO, these lights are more suited to barnyards and truck stops.. but that's just MO.)
I'd like to replace it with a photocell-controlled, dual floodlight fixture with PAR 38 CFLs. (Still not mood lighting... but a little less harsh and a bit more energy efficient.)
The current HPS light is mounted to the stucco wall, under the eaves, and is fed via an MC cable that passes through an appx 1/2" hole in the stucco, behind the light.
I usually like to do the cleanest install possible, but the stucco on the garage is 3/4" to 1" thick, and the inside is not accessible, so I'd like to avoid cutting a hole in the stucco and trying to install an internal JB.
The quicker (and a little dirtier) solution I see is to install an external "bell box" on the stucco wall, and attach the fixture to that.
I'd like to re-use the existing MC, if I can. Since the hole behind behind the box won't be big enough for cable + clamp, I'd like to attach the cable to the box by threading a clamp to the inside of the box. I'd then apply a ring of caulk to the wall, around the hole the cable passes through, before mounting the box.
From what I can find in the NEC (2008) this seems OK as long as I allow the equivalent of one conductor for box fill (for the internal clamp), and as long as everything is protected from the entry of moisture.
Since the box is under the eaves and is fully sealed except for where the MC enters, and I plan to seal that with caulk, it would appear to me that I've satisfied the requirements for such an installation in a damp location.
(NEC doesn't seem to be too specific on exactly how moisture should be excluded, unless I've missed something.)
Does anybody see anything wrong with any of this?
Thanks again!