ok so imagine an attic with about 15 wires running perpendicular to the joists. I want to put plywood flooring in. The wires are basically through the center of the attic - if they were on the edge, I would just leave them and not put plywood at the edge. I know most people with wires etc like this will build a 2x6 (and sometimes 2x4) perpendicular frame over the joists and then put the plywood on that. Is there any reason I can't just raise up the joists by screwing 2x2s on top of them along the whole length except where there's wires? (I would bunch the wires up tight together to minimize the spaces with wires and thus without 2x2s).
Whole reason is that this would be much faster than building a perpendicular box (although that's not so hard but it could run into issues with the rim joists meeting obstacles etc. It's less cost and materials to use 2x2s. The head room is a lot more if raised up only 1.5" with a 2x2 vs raised up 5.5" with 2x6s (or 3.5" raised up if using 2x4s but I don't realty trust the strength of a 2x4 joists even though it technically can span such a small space over existing joists 24" OC but I would rather just screw 2x2s over the existing joists and put the plywood over that. The wires might not have a lot of slack. If you build a perpendicular 2x6 frame over the existing joists, you need slack in the wires so they can weave under the new joists.
I mean, I don't really see why not, it's like saying you can't because raking/ sideways movement would actually break the 2x2s off of the joists which is not going to happen. But I'm baffled why no ones else does this instead of a 2x6 perpendicular frame.
I made a picture, it's not the actual attic, there is more than just one wire. but the red lines are how most people build the new frame over the wires, and the blue lines are 2x2s screwed on top of the joists.
The two pictures without the red and blue lines are what I don't want to do.
Whole reason is that this would be much faster than building a perpendicular box (although that's not so hard but it could run into issues with the rim joists meeting obstacles etc. It's less cost and materials to use 2x2s. The head room is a lot more if raised up only 1.5" with a 2x2 vs raised up 5.5" with 2x6s (or 3.5" raised up if using 2x4s but I don't realty trust the strength of a 2x4 joists even though it technically can span such a small space over existing joists 24" OC but I would rather just screw 2x2s over the existing joists and put the plywood over that. The wires might not have a lot of slack. If you build a perpendicular 2x6 frame over the existing joists, you need slack in the wires so they can weave under the new joists.
I mean, I don't really see why not, it's like saying you can't because raking/ sideways movement would actually break the 2x2s off of the joists which is not going to happen. But I'm baffled why no ones else does this instead of a 2x6 perpendicular frame.
I made a picture, it's not the actual attic, there is more than just one wire. but the red lines are how most people build the new frame over the wires, and the blue lines are 2x2s screwed on top of the joists.
The two pictures without the red and blue lines are what I don't want to do.
Attachments
-
108.4 KB Views: 11,995
-
70.9 KB Views: 3,752
-
172.5 KB Views: 8,601