In addition to SRW, options such as Timbers, Natural Stone, H-pile, Vegetated Walls, Cellular Containment Systems, Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) and Poured Concrete can be considered.
Factors to evaluate include cost, longevity, aesthetics, site access, machine access, complexity of construction and the ability to be engineered.
Cost can be evaluated by estimating the materials and labor required to install a hypothetical wall of x Height, y Width, and z Depth. Remember that some types of walls benefit more from Economies Of Scale than others.
Longevity can vary greatly based on factors including site conditions, manufacturing processes/quality control and installation details. A properly installed timber retaining wall may well outlast a poorly designed and installed poured concrete wall.
Aesthetics is a matter of personal opinion combined with site characteristics. A SRW may blend as poorly in a traditional Zen garden as a timber wall in a formal garden.
Site and Machine access are more important for some walls than others. Depth of excavation both vertical and horizontally into the bank need to be considered. Some larger SRW systems weigh upwards of 200 lbs apiece and require machines to move and set, while smaller SRW units can be light enough to be hand carried by one person and poured concrete has to be moved into place with chutes, pumps or buggies.
Due to the sheer volume of literature available from manufacturers, SRWs rate very well on complexity of construction and the ability to be engineered, . In addition, their lack of traditional footing and "Level-and-Go" style of construction make them very accessible to DIY projects. Natural stone is easy to install but hard to install well. The artistic aspect of beautiful dry-stack work often takes years to master and the variable nature of the material makes for difficult engineering.
Factors to evaluate include cost, longevity, aesthetics, site access, machine access, complexity of construction and the ability to be engineered.
Cost can be evaluated by estimating the materials and labor required to install a hypothetical wall of x Height, y Width, and z Depth. Remember that some types of walls benefit more from Economies Of Scale than others.
Longevity can vary greatly based on factors including site conditions, manufacturing processes/quality control and installation details. A properly installed timber retaining wall may well outlast a poorly designed and installed poured concrete wall.
Aesthetics is a matter of personal opinion combined with site characteristics. A SRW may blend as poorly in a traditional Zen garden as a timber wall in a formal garden.
Site and Machine access are more important for some walls than others. Depth of excavation both vertical and horizontally into the bank need to be considered. Some larger SRW systems weigh upwards of 200 lbs apiece and require machines to move and set, while smaller SRW units can be light enough to be hand carried by one person and poured concrete has to be moved into place with chutes, pumps or buggies.
Due to the sheer volume of literature available from manufacturers, SRWs rate very well on complexity of construction and the ability to be engineered, . In addition, their lack of traditional footing and "Level-and-Go" style of construction make them very accessible to DIY projects. Natural stone is easy to install but hard to install well. The artistic aspect of beautiful dry-stack work often takes years to master and the variable nature of the material makes for difficult engineering.