Is this outdated information from the NC handbook? (I can only find the 2014 edition, nothing newer) https://pluginnc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/19-ESVEHandbook_V4_final.pdfNM into the back of the box is fine. If the unit is hardwired it needs a disconnect.
PVC conduit into a PVC junction is easiest.
60 miles/day is a little much for 12A level 1 charging.My neighbor has a older Ford Hybrid. He drives 60 miles a day. He charges with the 120v cord, because he is to cheap to put in a bigger charger.
NY’s NEC2017 version, I dont think they amended. You can search my forum posts, here and on Reddit, for a little more analysis.@zanydroid can you cite the lack of need for a disconnect at that level?
Yeah, you can't go by what EVers actually do... EV communities are a huge echo chamber where misconceptions (starting with "need a 50A socket") get repeated louder and louder, and everyone has the singular goal of getting it "working" regardless of how. You see the same "safety trampled by lemmings" problem with dimmers on switch loops, generator hookups, etc.EDIT: I don’t see many disconnects on the installations I can see from streets.
I've read conflicting information, and I just went with the "I am literally feet from the panel so I'm calling it good enough" approach. I don't plan on selling this house anytime before I die so I won't have to worry about it.Interesting reading this, as well as the Tesla installation directions. My situation is simpler because everything is inside, and both the garage subpanel and the connection location are on the same wall, so I think the breaker can act as a disconnect (is that accurate?).
It's not a theory. It's hard science which was fully developed. As a result, after much heel-dragging and resistance by electricians who find it inconvenient, it finally went into NEC 110.14 in the 2014 edition (well before EVs took off in earnest). This should be nothing new to EVers. If scuttlebutt in the EV community is that "this is only a suggestion" or "something they are discovering", that is disappointing and reflects badly on the community. Surely someone in those communities knows this and speaks up. Are they simply ignored, silenced or canceled?Make sure not to over-tighten your connections in the Grizzl-E. Torque specs are listed in the Grizzl-E manual, and it's a wimpy amount of torque required. This is the running theory about the fires you read about with the Grizzl-E (over-torqueing).
Mistake. That is cheap Chinese garbage off Amazon, and a code violation since it is not UL Listed. Your friendly neighborhood electrical supply house stocks appropriate lug connectors for under a dollar that use a setscrew (no crimp needed).For hardwiring the Grizzl-E, you need terminal connectors. I ordered this kit here because the Grizzl-E hardwiring instructions didn't give specifics: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09JF3PN7K?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_product_details&th=1
You must be a blast at parties!As long as your Load Calculaton can support it, 40A is a good midrange choice (between the urge to go huge, and actual need). This will support 200 miles per 10 hour of charge for normal vehicles, and 100-150 for a monster like a Hummer EV. More than you'll ever need. It will also support 200 miles for 2 vehicles with Power Sharing if/when you get to that point.
It's not a theory. It's hard science which was fully developed. As a result, after much heel-dragging and resistance by electricians who find it inconvenient, it finally went into NEC 110.14 in the 2014 edition (well before EVs took off in earnest). This should be nothing new to EVers. If scuttlebutt in the EV community is that "this is only a suggestion" or "something they are discovering", that is disappointing and reflects badly on the community. Surely someone in those communities knows this and speaks up. Are they simply ignored, silenced or canceled?
The perception of "wimpy" really depends on the tool. "Wimpy" on a ratchet will seem Hulk-tight on a screwdriver.