Hi there,
My recently purchased 1960's property has a number of cracked sub-floor joists (perhaps 50% look to be damage-free). A pre-inspection builders report didn't mention them, and a subsequent visit by same builder says the cracks are normal for New Zealand rimu timber and it's not a problem. I'm not so sure. The damaged joists typically look like the one in the picture below, some are worse. The bearers are steel I-beams on concrete foundations. They look fine. The joists are 9x2", length approx 12ft, spacing 18". They are herringbone-braced twice per span.
The arrow indicates a gap above the joist between it and the partition wall above, which is essentially being supported only at its ends. I'd appreciate any comments.
Thanks.
My recently purchased 1960's property has a number of cracked sub-floor joists (perhaps 50% look to be damage-free). A pre-inspection builders report didn't mention them, and a subsequent visit by same builder says the cracks are normal for New Zealand rimu timber and it's not a problem. I'm not so sure. The damaged joists typically look like the one in the picture below, some are worse. The bearers are steel I-beams on concrete foundations. They look fine. The joists are 9x2", length approx 12ft, spacing 18". They are herringbone-braced twice per span.

The arrow indicates a gap above the joist between it and the partition wall above, which is essentially being supported only at its ends. I'd appreciate any comments.
Thanks.