Joined
·
68 Posts
no patterns on carpet. One of the rooms is roughly 15x40 the rolls of carpet are 12ft. Wide.
Well a 15x40 would take roughly a 12' x 40'3" and a 12' x 13' 9". Might take a little more or a little less. A 12' x 54' is 72 sq. yds.no patterns on carpet. One of the rooms is roughly 15x40 the rolls of carpet are 12ft. Wide.
Do you really fill the 3'x40' strip with 4 pieces of carpet?Well a 15x40 would take roughly a 12' x 40'3" and a 12' x 13' 9".
Wasn’t one of the original issues by the OP that the installers had proposed horizontal seams?Do you really fill the 3'x40' strip with 4 pieces of carpet?![]()
I think you’re missing my point ... i am agreeing with you.Yes, but this layout would require one long seam and three short ones. Guess it depends what you want; more seams or more waste ($).
If you don't you will have tons of waste.Do you really fill the 3'x40' strip with 4 pieces of carpet?![]()
Three pieces crossways would 36' even before you trim for seams.Not 40.Interesting we just had our first quote that recommended in the large room instead of a 12ft by 40 piece and 3ft 40 ( in 3 pieces) he recommended Running 3 12ft pieces the other direction horizontal, with the room layout we would cross over 2 seams, not sure about that.
he said light entering room would then go direction of the seams.
Yes I would. Just like the others, he wants to carry in smaller pieces.So you would be wary of the installer that wants it done the short way instead of one long piece ?
So you would buy 2 12' x 40 ' and have a 8' 9' x 40' as waste? Also, an installer will charge you for installing 2 12' x 40' . They get paid for whatever they handle.It may cost more, but I think I would rather have B than A.
View attachment 639779
It doesn't have to be waste. If you go back to post #9 there is a picture, looks like a couple of smaller rooms where smaller pieces could be used. We would need to see a dimensioned floor plan before rendering a final answer.So you would buy 2 12' x 40 ' and have a 8' 9' x 40' as waste?