Less amp draw and the circuit can deliver more current without larger/lower gauge wire, can support a bigger a/c unit or one with electric heat exceeding 1500w.
All I know is a few formulas, so decided to see if the Rated Input (w) from the Technical Specs page would work in my Power formula (P=EI) for comparison of amp draw for the 115v model and the 230v model.I've had that question. I don't do math very well. How much less amp draw?
OK, I believe you've found no fault with my comparison numbers used and the result, which is 4.96A for the 240v model is approximately half of the 115v model of 9.93A? I'm talking in general here, aside from the other variables you mention.240v is half the amps as 120v to deliver the same power.
Fan motors are rated in FLA, full load amps. Usually, the motor is not run fully loaded and rpm is limited by motor characteristics.
Compressors are rated in RLA, rated load amps. They take the amperage required to trip the thermal overload and adjust it with a formula.
Amp ratings don't always reflect draw in the real world. A/c compressors typically draw 80% or less of rated amps unless it's really hot.
OK, I'll remember that word "efficiencies," point taken.No fault.
If the efficiencies are the same, the real world amp draw would be half for the 240v.
User_12345a may not have noticed your post yet, or just hasn't gotten to it. Maybe this post will help.I understand that it uses half the amps, but it still uses the same total power (more or less...). Are there any benefits when comparing "identical" units where the only real difference is voltage?
I'm curious as I'm tempted to switch my old 240v unit to a 120v as it's a little cheaper and doesn't need to be huge (only 12k btu max). It's wired for 240 but wouldn't be difficult to change as it's a couple feet from the breaker. Is there a benefit to staying with 240?
I may look into units with heat... I'm sure at that point 240v will make a lot more sense.
I remember Monkey Wards, but only vaguely. Can't even remember why I remember itThere will be a slight increase in efficiency using the higher voltage unit due to less line current producing less voltage drop and consequently less wire heat loss.
On a personal note, the 240 volt units (we called it 220 back then) were the greatest thing that happened to business in the 50's and 60's. I made big bucks upsizing the many 60 amp 120 volt (110) services as a sweatheart deal from my buddy at Montgomery Wards who did the selling and passed the installation work my way. I made enough money to finally escape the bonds of that small town and relocate to SoCal and the rest is history. Actually all that is history... including Montgomery Ward (Monkey Wards it was called) which the young whipper snappers today never heard of.
A typical 100 amp 240 service billed out at $150. with a net profit of $120 for an easy day's work. In today's dollars, that would be equal to charging roughly $1300 for the job and netting $1000. (still good money for an easy 1 man day)
The way i'm reading the above quote, to operate a 12 BTU unit the operating cost of a 240 V would be half as much as 120 V because the 240 V draws half the amps a 120 V draws and this would be apparent on a electric bill if each had their own meter?240v is half the amps as 120v to deliver the same power.
Nope, you pay for power in watts not amps. The power use is roughly the same except for difference in efficiencies (minor)The way i'm reading the above quote, to operate a 12 BTU unit the operating cost of a 240 V would be half as much as 120 V because the 240 V draws half the amps a 120 V draws and this would be apparent on a electric bill if each had their own meter?