Joined
·
523 Posts
Hi All,
The 2008 NEC is adopted in my area, and I've been studying the Code.
210.4(C) says that MWBCs can only supply line-to-neutral loads, but Exception 2 says that L-to-N loads are not required if both ungrounded conductors are on a common trip breaker.
210.4(B) says that all MWBCs must have both ungnd. conductors on a common-trip, so it seems that all MWBCs under code would meet the exception above.
So am I right in surmising that I could have a 3 gang box fed by a single MWBC with 3 receptacles, each wired like this:
L1-N (120V)
L2-N (120V)
L1-L2 (240V) or L1-L2-N for a 4-wire 120V/240V receptacle.
I'm asking because I'm planning on redoing the electrical in my garage, and I figure that would give me the most flexibility on how I use some of my circuits in the future. I just think I might be missing something that prohibits it..
The 2008 NEC is adopted in my area, and I've been studying the Code.
210.4(C) says that MWBCs can only supply line-to-neutral loads, but Exception 2 says that L-to-N loads are not required if both ungrounded conductors are on a common trip breaker.
210.4(B) says that all MWBCs must have both ungnd. conductors on a common-trip, so it seems that all MWBCs under code would meet the exception above.
So am I right in surmising that I could have a 3 gang box fed by a single MWBC with 3 receptacles, each wired like this:
L1-N (120V)
L2-N (120V)
L1-L2 (240V) or L1-L2-N for a 4-wire 120V/240V receptacle.
I'm asking because I'm planning on redoing the electrical in my garage, and I figure that would give me the most flexibility on how I use some of my circuits in the future. I just think I might be missing something that prohibits it..