DIY Home Improvement Forum banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
18,333 Posts
Unless it can be proved that the one rod is enough to get the resistance down below 25 ohms the code requires an additional electrode. It is easier to drive two rods and be down with it and avoid the need to show the inspector your testing of the one rod.

Once the second electrode is driven there is no requirement to keep adding electrodes to get below 25 ohms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kpack

· Lic Elect/Inspector/CPO
Joined
·
369 Posts
I believe the 2 ground rods were decided as an alternate to the one.with just one rod,code requires a rather expensive test to determine if it will fall below a certain #. I think 2 rods will not give you any more protection then the one you already have.
It will give you more protection since each ground rod is on a different ground plane.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
203 Posts
Two ground rods will lower the effective resistance to ground, thus providing a more conductive path. For example, if each ground rod is 30 ohms, two ground rods in parallel will present a resistance of 15 ohms. The lower the resistance, the more current will flow to ground, as opposed to some alternate path.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
261 Posts
this and other recent ground rod discussions prompts me to ask the following question. If a service is bonded to an incoming copper water service, is any better protection provided by one or more ground rods? In my case the water service is about 40 feet away from the service entrance panel and any additional ground rods would be within a couple of feet of the panel. I understand that the cold water service ground met the code when the house was built in 1985. The copper water service is about 50 feet long to the street which is a cast iron main.

bernie
 

· Lic Electrical Inspector
Joined
·
1,844 Posts
I believe the 2 ground rods were decided as an alternate to the one.with just one rod,code requires a rather expensive test to determine if it will fall below a certain #. I think 2 rods will not give you any more protection then the one you already have.
The NEC does not require test. The inspector can request a megger test. Since he has to witness the test and can take several days to get to the job for the test. It is easier to drive the second rod and forget about it. Otherwise the EC can sit and wait for the EI to witness the test. If the test proves less than 25 ohms, no second rod is required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kpack

· DIY Enthusiast
Joined
·
1,131 Posts
The NEC does not require test. The inspector can request a megger test. Since he has to witness the test and can take several days to get to the job for the test. It is easier to drive the second rod and forget about it. Otherwise the EC can sit and wait for the EI to witness the test. If the test proves less than 25 ohms, no second rod is required.
Well if there's no test then how does one know that 2 rods will do the job and not just one rod?
 

· Lic Electrical Inspector
Joined
·
1,844 Posts
Well if there's no test then how does one know that 2 rods will do the job and not just one rod?
We don't. The NEC does not require more then two rods. I don't require the second rod. But if there is only one rod, I request the megger test. I have three days to complete the inspection including witness the test. It is cheaper to just drive two rods and be done with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NJMarine and Kpack

· Registered
Joined
·
10,401 Posts
I should ask, if the building has an entering water pipe or a concrete reinforcing bar as a grounding electrode, is just one ground rod sufficient?
 

· Licensed Electrician
Joined
·
4,352 Posts
I should ask, if the building has an entering water pipe or a concrete reinforcing bar as a grounding electrode, is just one ground rod sufficient?
No. If you use rod, you must be less than 25 ohms or drive a second rod. Even if you have properly bonded the other electrodes.

Note: There is some issues that do arise with Ufers. Some people will tell you that all you need to do is bond to the Ufer and nothing else. However, in my area, the Ufer only takes the place of the rods, and you will have to bond to water if present.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kpack

· Registered
Joined
·
63 Posts
I have only one myself. It was inspected when I did the service upgrade about 15 years ago. I have no intentions to install another one, nor am I required to.

If the installation met the code in effect when it was done/inspected there is no need or requirement to "upgrade" to newer code requirements. The NEC is not retroactive. To put it simple, I agree w/ the quote above.
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top