Quote:
Originally Posted by Burat
My builder wants to charge $3/sq ft EXTRA to lay down porcelain tile, versus no extra charge for ceramic - is this reasonable (I am building a house in NJ).
Maybe I should just stick to ceramic tile (this is for the kitchen); does anyone think there is a difference bet the porcelain and ceramic tiles in regards to puppy attacks?
|
Is that just extra labor charge for installation or covering the tile upgrade also. The porcelain product is more expensive than ceramic, and his tile setter may get a little more for installation as there is often breakage (thus recuts) when porcelain is cut around corners or fixtures. If it covers both, it may be a little high, but I would not call it unreasonable. I personally do not see this recent fascination with porcelain for residential use. It is a comercial product that has some how come into residential vogue. If you are getting a quality ceramic, it will be more than sufficient for a residence, but do avoid the bottom end stuff.
JUST SAW YOUR FOLLOWUP THAT IT IS PURE LABOR, NOW I WOULD CALL THAT OUTRAGEOUS.