DIY Chatroom Home Improvement Forum (http://www.diychatroom.com/)
-   Off Topic (http://www.diychatroom.com/f39/)

 brric 05-27-2010 10:48 AM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by AllanJ (Post 447548) Yes the hot to neutral should be around 118.5 volts, except that, as you said, it is not working. With one batch of outlets dead and another batch live on the same circuit, it is possible that the bad connection is at one of the live outlets, specifically where the wires continue on to the dead group. I am guessing that the neutral is broken somewhere and you are measuring phantom voltage of 97 volts. Phantom voltage is a phenomenon that is very lengthy to explain and it is more likely to be measured with modern digital voltmeters. Phantom voltage is measured in a dead line that runs within a cable juxtaposed with another line including a ground wire that could have completed the circuit. Example: Hot wire is intact supplying 120 volts. Ground wire is intact. Voltmeter probes touched to hot and neutral. Neutral is dead but miniscule amount of current can leak between it and the ground wire, through insulation and all. A circuit is indeed complete although only a few microamperes can make the jump from neutral to ground, but enough that the meter's internal circuitry rates it as 97 volts. Next, measure neutral to ground. Hot wire in the same cable leaks a miniscule amount of current into the dead neutral running alongside, the voltmeter picks it up and through the voltmeter circuitry to ground, the current happens to cause a readout of 1.5 volts on the meter. Different brands of meters will read out different numbers. A test that electricians often do to avoid confusion with phantom voltage is to use a small incandescent light, say 25 watts, with the terminals or leads acrross the supposedly 120 volt circuit. When phantom voltage is involved, it will not light up the bulb and will be seen to drop to zero when both the light and the voltmeter are put across the circuit.
Can you give us some documentation about how current leaks through insulation? I'd love to know about it. I'd also like to know about currents between neutral and ground in a properly installed circuit.

 brric 05-27-2010 02:52 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by AllanJ (Post 447701) Phantom currents "leaking through insulation" are due to capacitance. When AC voltage is present (relative to something such as ground) on one metal object and another nearby metal object is bonded to the same something (ground) then a flow of current is induced. In the situation, the two metal objects are lengths of wire in the same Romex cable. The material (plastic, air, glass, waxed paper etc.) separating the two metal object influences how much current will flow, as well as other things such as voltage, AC frequency, distance between the metal objects, surface area of the metal objects, etc. Probably not. If something inside the switch or receptacle got deformed during your efforts to yank the wire out, it's not safe to use any more. Also, the loose piece of wire could migrate within the switch or receptacle and cause a short circuit.
That's called induction. It has nothing to do with currents "leaking" through insulation.

 AllanJ 05-27-2010 02:56 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by brric (Post 447572) Can you give us some documentation about how current leaks through insulation? I'd love to know about it. I'd also like to know about currents between neutral and ground in a properly installed circuit.
It's a capacitance effect. When AC voltage is present (relative to something such as ground) on one metal object and another nearby metal object is bonded to the same something (ground) then a flow of current is induced. In the situation, the two metal objects are lengths of wire in the same Romex cable.

Say you have the meter probes on the hot wire and the (dead) neutral wire. On the positive half cycle of the AC, current flows from hot through the meter to neutral and in general doesn't go any further but enough goes through the meter to build up a positive charge on the dead neutral wire. At the same time a negative charge builds up on the ground wire because that is bonded to neutral back at the panel.

On the negative half cycle the positive charge builds up on the ground wire and a negative charge coming through the meter builds up on the dead neutral.

The changeover from positive charge to negative charge and back again is synonymous with an AC current flow, although small, probably on the order of microamperes.

The material (plastic, air, glass, waxed paper etc.) separating the two metal object influences how much current will flow, as do other things (voltage, AC frequency, distance between the metal objects, surface area of the metal objects, etc.)

'

 Yoyizit 05-27-2010 05:39 PM

This is how much capacitance you should see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitance
see
Pair of parallel wires

The current seems to flow through the dielectric/insulator, but it doesn't. The charge builds up and bleeds down on each conductor over each cycle.

For 10' of Romex connected to 120vac @ 60 Hz you should see about 60 uA of current due to the capacitive reactance. Or, just use a C-meter.

 brric 05-27-2010 05:59 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Yoyizit (Post 447809) This is how much capacitance you should see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitance see Pair of parallel wires The current seems to flow through the dielectric/insulator, but it doesn't. The charge builds up and bleeds down on each conductor over each cycle. For 10' of Romex connected to 120vac @ 60 Hz you should see about 60 uA of current due to the capacitive reactance. Or, just use a C-meter.
\
Capacitive reactance is an impedance to current flow not a producer of current.

 Yoyizit 05-27-2010 06:15 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by brric (Post 447823) \ Capacitive reactance is an impedance to current flow not a producer of current.
A voltage/current source, and a circuit, was implied. :)

What makes phantom voltages weird is that, usually you are measuring the output of a voltage source with a voltmeter.
In the phantom voltage case you are measuring the voltage output of a current source, that source being 120vac in series with a few hundred K of capacitive reactance. In this case, a cheapie 1000 ohms/volt meter which input impedance changes with each range is telling you more truth than a constant high input impedance DVM.

 brric 05-27-2010 06:18 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Yoyizit (Post 447830) A voltage/current source, and a circuit, was implied. :)
So what? Capacitive reactance is expressed in ohms not uAmps.

 AllanJ 05-27-2010 07:53 PM

Quote:
 ... currents between neutral and ground ...
In a properly installed and properly functioning system the neutrals are bonded to the grounds onlyh at the main panel.

If there is no fault (unwanted contact between wires and/or other metal objects) then there is no load current returning to the panel via the ground but positive/negative charges can still build up on the ground wire running with (juxtaposed with) the neutral and also the hot wire. Any net positive/negative imbalance between neutral and ground is drained off, or cancelled out if you insist, at the panel neutral/ground bus bar. The act of draining this off is a minute current flowing down the ground wire to the panel.

Voltage across any two points in the electrical system equals current times resistance between those points. It is possible that for a circuit with several amperes of load, there is a difference of a few volts between the neutral at the load location and ground (due to resistance in the neutral and therefore voltage drop). But any phantom current induced in the ground is so small that there is almost zero voltage drop in the (probably similarly sized) ground wire from the same location we measured the voltage drop in the neutral. Then measuring the voltage between neutral and ground out at that location reveals just the few volts of voltage drop in the neutral.

 Yoyizit 05-27-2010 08:17 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by brric (Post 447831) So what? Capacitive reactance is expressed in ohms not uAmps.
Ay, yi, yi. . .

 brric 05-27-2010 08:22 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by AllanJ (Post 447870) In a properly installed and properly functioning system the neutrals are bonded to the grounds onlyh at the main panel. If there is no fault (unwanted contact between wires and/or other metal objects) then there is no load current returning to the panel via the ground but positive/negative charges can still build up on the ground wire running with (juxtaposed with) the neutral and also the hot wire. Any net positive/negative imbalance between neutral and ground is drained off, or cancelled out if you insist, at the panel neutral/ground bus bar. The act of draining this off is a minute current flowing down the ground wire to the panel. Voltage across any two points in the electrical system equals current times resistance between those points. It is possible that for a circuit with several amperes of load, there is a difference of a few volts between the neutral at the load location and ground (due to resistance in the neutral and therefore voltage drop). But any phantom current induced in the ground is so small that there is almost zero voltage drop in the (probably similarly sized) ground wire from the same location we measured the voltage drop in the neutral. Then measuring the voltage between neutral and ground out at that location reveals just the few volts of voltage drop in the neutral.
That is ridiculous. You cannot have cureent flow without a difference in potential. Neutrals and equipment grounds are at the same potential. There is no current between neutrals and grounds in a normal, correctly installed, fault free circuit.

 Yoyizit 05-27-2010 08:27 PM

Here.
Take two of these,
go to bed and call me in the morning.

 Yoyizit 05-28-2010 10:59 AM

Yo, brric! :thumbup:

Did you survive the night with those two women I sent you?

If so, you're a better man than I :laughing:

BTW, in general, this statement
You cannot have cureent flow without a difference in potential
is false.

 Jim Port 05-28-2010 11:28 AM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Yoyizit (Post 448084) BTW, in general, this statement You cannot have cureent flow without a difference in potential is false.
Care to explain how two items at the same potential would have a flow between them?

 brric 05-28-2010 11:45 AM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Jim Port (Post 448097) Care to explain how two items at the same potential would have a flow between them?
Thank you, Jim.

 Yoyizit 05-28-2010 02:28 PM

You hook up a current source to a short circuit.
By definition, the setpoint current flows; 1A, 0.1A, whatever.
By definition, there is zero voltage drop across a short circuit.

And this is without using superconductors.

Congrats on surviving those two women. Next time I'll send you four.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.

vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1