||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
|11-04-2008, 08:01 AM||#1|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,889Rewards Points: 1,000
"Bar Stool Economics": for a laugh
I found this on another site and made me think...I take no credit for it but just wanted to pass it on - for those who haven't decided which candidate to chose from...
Suppose that ten men go out every day for a beer at the pub, and the bill
for all ten comes to $100. If they settled their tab the way they each paid taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
"Since you are all such good customers", he said, "I'm going to reduce the
cost of your daily beer by $20." So, drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way they paid their taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that
from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before and the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the pub, the men began to compare their savings.
'I only got a dollar out of the $20', declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!'
'Yeah, that's right', exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!' 'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!' 'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men
in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'
The nine men surrounded the tenth man and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
“The average American woman is about 25 pounds heavier than she was in 1960...Recognizing obesity as a disease will help change the way the medical community tackles this complex issue that affects approximately 1 in 3 Americans,”
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|window casing stool help? Images posted||chinese_lover||Carpentry||12||07-23-2008 10:04 AM|
|How to remove grey marks on porcelain stool...||RippySkippy||Plumbing||1||06-16-2008 10:02 AM|
|What router bit is used to create the inside angle on a window stool?||Mikedks||Building & Construction||7||05-12-2008 05:43 PM|
|stool flushes to slow||dtarbet||Plumbing||3||12-28-2007 07:46 PM|