 |
|
03-09-2009, 03:44 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 567
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
damn'd if i can remember the rule does anyone know the aci recommended slab sizes as the dimensions relate to thickness ? ? ? seem to recall a 20:1 rule of thumb - eg, 4" slab should be no more than 6'8" square,,, mesh or rebar wasn't a factor but also ' as i recall ' 
thanks, guys !
|
|
|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. DIYChatroom.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any home improvement task!
03-09-2009, 04:52 PM
|
#2
|
|
Remodeling Contractor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 3,590
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
Are you talking about distance before needed crack prevention joints or size before expansion joints? Would not seem right to have a size relate to thickness. A mall floor would have to be 2 feet thick?
|
|
|
03-09-2009, 05:00 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 567
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
thanks, bobby, yes,,, there's a rule of thumb & i can't recall it 'cause i got too used to reading engineers' plans,,, come to think of it, expansion jnts're really unnecessary in most instances - isolation & contraction, yes,,, how many times do i have to see expansion jnts in sidewalk specs but not in highways, runways, or aprons ? ? ? 
|
|
|
03-09-2009, 06:11 PM
|
#4
|
|
Remodeling Contractor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 3,590
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
They are there in highways but get filled with backer rod, butyl caulking and then whatever the road surface is. Still not clear as to what your reference is asking about
|
|
|
03-09-2009, 07:53 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 567
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
matter of fact, i started on those very same jnts, mr bob but NEVER butyl caulk,,, either closed cell backer rod & silicone OR heat-resistant rope & hot-applied astm 3405 or 3406 for jet-fuel resistance,,, asphalt got the 3405 or 1190 w/tape for a bond breaker.
let's try this question - IF you were placing a 4" slab, what's the largest dimension you'd wind up with & what backup information would/could you present to the client justifying the slab size ? ? ?
|
|
|
03-09-2009, 10:17 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota - Latitude 45.057 Longitude -93.074
Posts: 3,325
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
In a typical slab, you generally do not have expansion joints unless you have street or highway!!! - You have control joints to control where the concrete cracks and can be maintained. Concrete does not expand beyond the lenth it is when it is poured. - The curing shrinkage is greater than the temperature expansion.
Joints between a slab and a structure are used to separate two different types of structures.
The problem occurs when the joints get full of "junk" that prevents the slabs to expand back to where they were. - Complicated by the movement up and down caused by loads (especially by repetitive highway loads). For a patio or a driveway, properly sawed joints that are cleaned and calked withing a month or so of pouring minimize movement, dirt and maintenance.
No matter how thick the slab is, it will shrink during curing the same amount. Rebar and wire mesh will decrease the amount of shrinkage cracking if used properly. Fiber mesh is really only good for micro surface cracking and is subject to the correct plant mixing times and placement.
|
|
|
03-09-2009, 11:39 PM
|
#7
|
|
Old School
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Petersburg, FL Minds of moderate caliber ordinarily condemn everything which is beyond them.
Posts: 3,056
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
An interesting article on the subject.....
Click Here
__________________
"True eloquence consists in saying all that is necessary, and only that which is."
François Duc de La Rochefoucauld
Willie T
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 06:26 AM
|
#8
|
|
Remodeling Contractor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 3,590
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
I used 2-3 times ( in feet) the depth of the slab (in inches) for control joints. I got this from an article I read from concrete network I prefer to use more joints if customer does not complain too much.
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 07:35 AM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 567
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
in the shadows of my memory seems the thumb rule was 20 x inch thickness express'd in feet / 10 [ 4" x 20 = 80 / 10 = 8 FEET ],,, i gotta start buying those pills they shill on tv ) shoot, didn't even think about conc network & used to advertise on it,,, thanks for the jog, bobby
Last edited by yesitsconcrete; 03-10-2009 at 01:11 PM.
Reason: ' to correct an f'n dumb*** mistaken typo
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 09:44 AM
|
#10
|
|
Old School
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Petersburg, FL Minds of moderate caliber ordinarily condemn everything which is beyond them.
Posts: 3,056
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
Pretty sure you meant FEET ? It's OK... the pills start kicking in fairly quickly.
__________________
"True eloquence consists in saying all that is necessary, and only that which is."
François Duc de La Rochefoucauld
Willie T
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 09:50 AM
|
#11
|
|
Remodeling Contractor
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 3,590
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie T
Pretty sure you meant FEET ? It's OK... the pills start kicking in fairly quickly. 
|
Oh.. read this too late.. now I have to many joints.. or was this a problem with someone else
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 10:20 AM
|
#12
|
|
Old School
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: St. Petersburg, FL Minds of moderate caliber ordinarily condemn everything which is beyond them.
Posts: 3,056
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Mariani
Oh.. read this too late.. now I have to many joints.. or was this a problem with someone else 
|
Hey, I was already heading out the door to chalk off 50 or 60 more lines on my old drive.
__________________
"True eloquence consists in saying all that is necessary, and only that which is."
François Duc de La Rochefoucauld
Willie T
|
|
|
03-10-2009, 01:12 PM
|
#13
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 567
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
thanks for the laugh, guys,,, i was head'd out de door at de time
|
|
|
03-30-2009, 02:14 PM
|
#14
|
|
Concrete & Masonry
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,261
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by concretemasonry
In a typical slab, you generally do not have expansion joints unless you have street or highway!!! - You have control joints to control where the concrete cracks and can be maintained. Concrete does not expand beyond the lenth it is when it is poured. - The curing shrinkage is greater than the temperature expansion.
Joints between a slab and a structure are used to separate two different types of structures.
The problem occurs when the joints get full of "junk" that prevents the slabs to expand back to where they were. - Complicated by the movement up and down caused by loads (especially by repetitive highway loads). For a patio or a driveway, properly sawed joints that are cleaned and calked withing a month or so of pouring minimize movement, dirt and maintenance.
No matter how thick the slab is, it will shrink during curing the same amount. Rebar and wire mesh will decrease the amount of shrinkage cracking if used properly. Fiber mesh is really only good for micro surface cracking and is subject to the correct plant mixing times and placement.
|
I know this is an older thread, but I had to comment. This is probably the most informative & accurite post I have read on this site.
BTW, I have been taught that the ratio is 24:1, or 4" =8', 5" = 10', etc...
|
|
|
03-30-2009, 04:09 PM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 567
|
what slab size relative to thickness ? ? ?
that's nuttin' you shouldda been here before i lost my memory ! ! ! dick & i usually agree, tho !
|
|
|
-->
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|