DIY Home Improvement Forum banner

Concrete Contractor and Masonry Contractor made a huge mistake

14K views 19 replies 14 participants last post by  consolidatedBui 
#1 · (Edited)
I am here in Illinois and was wondering what my rights are as a homeowner for a large rehab I'm doing to my home?

I hired a concrete contractor to pour 20" wide x 10" thick footings for a new room addition and a new attached garage. He did pour the footings and get them all in. I also hired a masonry contractor to build a cinder block foundation wall for the new room addition and new garage. He did get the block in and it all looked good.

When the carpenter started to frame on the new foundation he found the new foundation for the new room addition to be 6" out of square and said it was unusable for him to build on. After a three hour fight with the concrete contractor and the masonry contractor it was resolved me moving one end of the new foundation 3.5" and the other side 3.5". I was supposed to have a solid 40' wall from the garage to the new room addition but now i have a 3" step out on the new room addition. but it is square now.

The concrete conctractor took the blame and eate the cost cause he said he set the pins. But both the Concrete contractor and the masonry contractor said they did not square anything. and the Masonry contractor just laid his block and said it's not his problem to square the foundation since the concrete contractor set the pins.

Now the builder is on the garage and it is 3.5" out of square on a 28' wall. 5" out of square if you measure the four corners diagonal.

So now I am fighting with the two contractors again about fixing this problem. Both are saying it's not the fault and both are saying they did not square anything. The entire garage has been backfiled and ready for flat work but now it all was to be torn out and started over about $7,500 - $9,000 of work to be re-done. I am blaming the masonry contractor for not squaring anything and moving his block on the footings to make square. The Masonry contractor is blaming the concrete contractor for setting the pins.

The good thing no one was been paid a dime yet and is not until fixed. Question do I have to pay them anything or can I fire them both and start all over with new contractors? Do I have to let them fix there scew up even though I let them fix the house and it still isn't right according to the blueprint we just made it work.

All of this is on a construction loan from a bank. The Concrete contractor said he would buy all materials for the masonry contractor to redo the garage foundation and the masonry contractor said he is doing his labor for free, and the concrete wants to excavate the garage his self. I don't want that I want the excavator who has down the entire job to do it again because his work was done excellent and he has underground insurance. The concrete contractor and the masonry contractor does not want to pay for the excavator. And lastly both the concrete contractor and the masonry contractor said they will not layout the work or setup the pins for square if I make them redo everyhing and that will be on me to layout the work and the square.

The pictures attached are the first one is of the foundation that was out f square and to fix they bumped it out three inches past the garage notice bump out.

The second picture is of the garage that is 3.5" out of square as it sits right now.
Any suggestions?
 

Attachments

See less See more
2
#2 ·
I'll preface this by saying that this chatroom is focused on DIY work, and issues regarding legal and monetary dealings with contractors have no place here.

However, discussing squaring footings and foundations is relative! :yes:

Typically, the footing guy places his footings based on stakes set by a surveyor and by following the plans. If he's competent, he's going to check that they're reasonably square before placing concrete. But with spread footings there is a little room for error.

When the walls are formed for concrete (or blocked in your case) it is absolutely critical that the wall guy square his work and not rely on the footings to be exact. Doing it that way is irresponsible and will just about always lead to problems...And it tells me he doesn't know what he's doing or take much pride in his work. With poured concrete walls, the forms and rebar are placed, and then the forms are squared up using stringlines and measurements...They're adjusted as necessary before placement of concrete. It is very common for a foundation to not be perfectly centered on a footing and instead slightly offset. He should've laid out his first course and set stringlines, then checked for square.
 
#7 ·
Sorry to say, but your post is a good "advertisement" for GC's/builders, & why they charge what they do. If you had a good GC, this would be HIS problem right now instead of yours. Instead, your probably going to have to seek the help of an lawyer.

I agree with KC, BOTH of these contractors should be checking the footings much less their own walls. There usually is a statement on either the blueprints or contract that states something along the lines of: "if any subcontractor finds a problem with another trades work, the discreancies should be immediatly reported to th eGC or Architect." This is added to stop compounding problems & "finger pointing." When it comes to the block walls, anyone who is laying block walls of that length @ 5" out of square without noticing it at the corners while working ISN'T truly a professional.

Legally, I believe you have to give the original contractor's ample oppurtunity to correct there mistakes. This is why you need to speak with a lawyer with these kind of questions. Looking/hearing about their work tells me these contractors have the upper hand with the legal background in this situation. Meaning: this isn't the first time they screwed up & may not get paid in full.

On a side note, 2 other things you may want to look into:

- There's no garage floor ledge in what appears to be the garage.
- You may want to check code requirements for block basements & sill plates. Here in WI, if the top of the wall isn't capped/closed, a full width sill plate is required. I have no idea why a mason would lay caps on the top course, but yours didn't.

Good Luck.
 
#8 ·
I'm not sure it's on the concrete guy, unless the pins were so far off it was impossible for the mason's to run square.

But a quality mason would have set his corners square, plumb, and true (the hard part). Then run mason lines and filled in the field (the easy part). Sounds like a shotty contractor if he just ran cinders over the pins. I would sue him for every penny you can get. I know I know... no legal advice!
 
#9 ·
This is an obviously unfortunate case, but I agree with the post that stated you will need a lawyer. In a case such as this, the subcontractors are responsible for doing whatever their contract calls for, provided it is a legal contract (i.e. you are not asking them to do something illegal, against code, or something that is physically impossible). So you are going to have to get some help from an attorney to determine what exactly you contracted with each subcontractor to do, i.e. who was responsible for layout, who was responsible for checking the work, etc.

If you do not have a written contract, or you have a vaguely worded contract, things get very difficult, since of course the parties will have different opinions about what was intended. But figuring out liability is what attorneys do for a living, so there will undoubtedly be a local one who will be happy to help you (for a fee).
 
#10 ·
i am absolutely sure that if there was a GC on site he would claim it was not his fault either because {insert lame excuse here}.

they should definately not be digging the hole out themselves as they are not pros in this area and obviously are just saving a few bucks because of THEIR problem.

but if you can't get around that... get a permit for the excavation work and have the city inspector give the OK for proper excavation. cost of permit is born by the concrete people as your compromise to allow them to do the digging themselves.

glad you didn't pay anything.. watch out for leans being put on your home.

hope it works out for you. please keep us updated.
Knucklez
 
#11 ·
don't be a cheapskate & cut more of your nose off as its only going to get worse,,, hire a retired gc/superintendent, or competent carpenter foreman to oversee the work,,, yes, its going to be an unanticipated expense but, adding in new legal fees, you're already over budget,,, how much nose do you want left for the housewarming :eek:

really surprised your lender's not concerned so i'll bet they aren't aware yet ! ! ! its possible they'll ' suggest ' you find someone - good advice if you ask me !! :thumbup:
 
#12 ·
If you try to be a General Contractor, you have to accept the results of what you control and solve the problems with your abilities and experience in a new "business".

If you do not have contracts, specification and some inspection (private or free permit inspector), you don't have much to stand on.
 
#13 ·
Hey Mr. General Contractor, guess what? It is YOUR responsibility to make sure that the subs do each segment of the work to plan. YOU, as GC are responsible for setting grade and initial points. YOU as GC are responsible for making sure the footings are placed correctly. YOU as GC are responsible for making sure that the foundation is laid plumb and square.

As the General Contractor, it is up to you to enforce contract provisions. I assume you have plans and specifications and contracts?
 
#15 ·
I was primed to jump in, but a few of the guys laid it out.

It all goes back to the foundation....if it is off, nothing following will be right, and now you know...when a problem is discovered, you cannot "adjust" to make it right.

As advised above......hire a retired GC/builder/ inspector that can oversee this project. Bear in mind that the 10% fee is peace of mind. We know it is hard to admit that you are in over your head with issues like this, but a GC has the advantages...they "know" most in the business, and subs treat them much differently, since there is a recourse from a GC....they talk. These subs will see your money and the job one time....a GC's opinion leads to lots of other jobs...bad opinion = no more work....good opinion = referrals.
 
#16 ·
Are there really concrete contractors out there that pour footings without a proper construction survey? I wouldn't be caught dead doing that, nor would I be caught dead not having my construction survey sub stake everything out first if the contract spelled out it was my responsibility. And this unfortunate situation is exactly why we do it this way. It only costs me a couple hundred bucks to have it properly staked - by a licensed professional surveyor. He's never screwed up, and I sleep soundly knowing the liability is covered. Plus he's independent and has no stake in this other than doing it absolutely correctly. A concrete contractor may be inclined to rush or skip a step. Or just be plain inexperienced.

My advice to everyone that reads this thread in the future is this: when GC'ing your own job, have someone in your network that knows what they're doing and can give you advice start to finish, so these kind of mistakes can be avoided.

For the OP, I don't envy you. I would talk to the bank and tell them what happened and tell them you need to get a lawyer involved. It would suck out loud if someone slapped a lien on your property to force you into some sort of negotiation, and a lawyer would help you the most right now.

And if there was a paid GC on this job, it would ultimately be his responsibility to sort out. He'd fighting this battle with his subs right now, not you.
 
#17 ·
Are there really concrete contractors out there that pour footings without a proper construction survey? I wouldn't be caught dead doing that, nor would I be caught dead not having my construction survey sub stake everything out first if the contract spelled out it was my responsibility. And this unfortunate situation is exactly why we do it this way. It only costs me a couple hundred bucks to have it properly staked - by a licensed professional surveyor. He's never screwed up, and I sleep soundly knowing the liability is covered. Plus he's independent and has no stake in this other than doing it absolutely correctly. A concrete contractor may be inclined to rush or skip a step. Or just be plain inexperienced.
Aggie, we actually set 95% of our own corners in residetial additions. Never have these problems. The very few times the surveying was done by a sub, they were wrong. They all had a tenancy to take their starting points off of the wrong elemnet of the existing structure. The one that stays strong in my mind was a 1800 sq. ft. addition footprint at some odd angle (like 23.45 degrees or something) to the existing 1860's house. They had taken a starting point off of the house over 3+ layers of siding, not the rim joist or foundation. I called & explained the discrepancies to the firm, they told me there wasn't much they could do, it was layed out right according to there transit & software.

On new residential, we almost always have 2 or 3 corners staked for us to reference. I always check set backs off of property lines myself if I know there is little margin. Our work often times gets re-certified before backill, never failed one in 11 years yet. I wish the same could be said for our surveyors lay-outs. If I could trust their marks, we could save a vast amount of time.

There's no excuse that a mason or concrete contractor can't square a residential addition themselves. If they cant handle the math, or are too lazy to double or triple check, they should go back to working fo an employer again.

As for the rest of your post, I agree completely.
 
#18 ·
The concrete conctractor took the blame and eate the cost cause he said he set the pins.

All of this is on a construction loan from a bank. The Concrete contractor said he would buy all materials for the masonry contractor to redo the garage foundation and the masonry contractor said he is doing his labor for free, and the concrete wants to excavate the garage his self. I don't want that I want the excavator who has down the entire job to do it again because his work was done excellent and he has underground insurance. The concrete contractor and the masonry contractor does not want to pay for the excavator. And lastly both the concrete contractor and the masonry contractor said they will not layout the work or setup the pins for square if I make them redo everyhing and that will be on me to layout the work and the square.
quote]

I'm not a lawyer, but it seems that between the two contractors, they've agreed to remedy the situation. You need to have someone square up and locate the starter pins and they will build it to spec. Sounds like neither of these guys was charged with squaring up the job. Around here if the contractor agrees to fix his screw up at no expense to you, then you don't have a legal case. It sounds like the only hang up is with the excavating. If I were one of the contractors, I would want to use my own equipment to minimize my out of pocket expense to correct the problem as well. I'd say let them rebuild it. You provide the locations. You've already agreed to the "fix" on the other mistake, so no biscuit there either. Let them finish, pay the bill and chalk it up to lessons learned. :whistling2:
 
#19 ·
i'm w/you, jo,,, have laid out many runways, aprons, slabs, & roads & found errors,,, that doesn't mean we didn't use licens'd surveyors - we just had to ck EVERYONE's work,,, while arch, engineers, & owners occasionally make errors, many times it falls to the contractor to find & report 'em,,, knowing something's wrong & NOT doing so makes US liable for damages,,, change orders & rfi's are VERY common.
 
#20 · (Edited)
I am a GC in Wilkes Barre, Pa and I am firm about this responsibility. The footing were put in wrong and the person that put them in is liable for doing it right but the masonry contractor is even more wrong... The footing should have been poured 24" and the mason would have been able to lay it out square., but the cheap prick wanted to save concrete cost....... Hence you need to join both parties in a lawsuit about this. I lay the blame mostly on the mason because he should have never laid a block after he laid out his block and realized it was out of square.... I have never in all my days EVER heard of a mason not laying out his walls... It makes no sense... I sincerely hope you have specific language in the mason contract that list out the actual size of the addition, not just lay block for addition... if this verbage is not present, I feel the his legal responsibility becomes more cloudy....
I hope you have it repaired at no cost to you.....
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top