Quote:
Originally Posted by pcampbell
The reason I said tandem is because I thought he said he only has room for tandems.
|
Well, if there is room for two tandems, there is room for a 2-p breaker.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcampbell
A) Each circuit of a MWBC should be on separate buses?
|
Each conductor
must be from separate busses, other wise you have two hots with 0V difference. If you wired this way, using a 3-wire cable (or 3 separate wires), your neutral would carry the
sum of both circuits which could result in overload.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcampbell
B) Both circuits of a MWBC should commonly trip?
|
Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcampbell
C) Regular 1" tandems by nature can't be on separate phases, but quads can (since quads take up 2 1" spaces and use the 2 outters and inners).
|
I'll take your word for it but I'm not sure how this is relevant. I don't deal with tandems normally.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcampbell
D) If you have 2 separate circuits and they are connected to the same outlet but the tab is broken, do these need to be common trip?
|
Well, let's think about this for a moment. If you ran a MWBC to a receptacle and didn't remove the tab, you'd have some difficulty resetting the circuit breaker. So you remove the tab to effectively split the duplex receptacle. Assuming that this is served by a MWBC, see "B." You
could split the receptacle and feed it with two hots from the same side of the panel as long as you break the tab on the neutral side and provide a dedicated neutral for each. However, this is no longer a MWBC and remember how the idea is to reduce the overall number of conductors?