 |
|
02-21-2009, 12:36 AM
|
#1
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 13
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
I have two subs in which one of them will be fed with 4awg Thhn conductors and the other with 6/3 romex. Would sharing these feeds in the same conduit abide by code? Do i even need conduit for indoor runs? Planning on using flexible conduit if indeed required. Thanks!
|
|
|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. DIYChatroom.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any home improvement task!
02-21-2009, 07:24 AM
|
#2
|
|
Licensed Electrical Cont.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY State
Posts: 6,168
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Why in the world would you put 6/3NM in conduit indoors?
Why would you do it at all?
The size of conduit you would need would offset the reason for using conduit in the first place.
__________________
Sometimes I feel like if I answer any more questions it is like someone trying to climb over a fence to jump off a bridge and me giving them a boost.
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 07:47 AM
|
#3
|
|
Electrical Contractor
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chester, VA.
Posts: 774
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
No, not normally is conduit required indoors. The NM anyway.
If you run the separate THHN conductors, they will need to be in some type of raceway.
The 6/3 will need to be derated to the 60 deg chart, and the THHN conductors use the 75 deg chart.
As always, it's best to check with your local authority, you never know, they may be from Chicago.
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 12:40 AM
|
#4
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 13
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey
Why in the world would you put 6/3NM in conduit indoors?
Why would you do it at all?
|
Haha, its you again, thanks for the reply.......Why in the world you ask?
Well in my world putting all feeds in a single conduit then feeding them to the service is much easier than otherwise, with dual feed, therefore double the material and double the labor (drilling holes, fittings, screwing, etc).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy Petey
The size of conduit you would need would offset the reason for using conduit in the first place.
|
Please clarify. So your un-offsetting implementation would be to use conduit for the Thhn and bare run for NM?? Wouldn't 2" conduit house both feeds generously? Its not like i would require 12"conduit......lol This world isn't absolute, therefore i would like to hear some alternative......to offset my reasoning.
Thank for the informative reply wirenut1110
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 01:15 AM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,543
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
What speedy means is that, why would you run romex in conduit instead of separate conductors.
Unless your just sleeving the romex through conduit...
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 01:19 AM
|
#6
|
|
You talking to me?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: sw mi
Posts: 5,407
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
don't the current codes prohibit running NM in conduit except for a protective nipple?
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 02:47 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,543
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nap
don't the current codes prohibit running NM in conduit except for a protective nipple?
|
I don't think it doesn't. Point is, why? You could need a larger conduit than if you were running separate conductors.
You can sleeve it through conduit for physical protection, in this situation, fill doesn't apply.
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 10:58 AM
|
#8
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 13
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgsgww
What speedy means is that, why would you run romex in conduit instead of separate conductors.
Unless your just sleeving the romex through conduit...
|
Yes the plan was to just sleeve the 6/3, if i could find 4/3 i would do the same, but none is available in my area so for it i am going with 4awg Thhn. Any sources for finding #4/3?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgsgww
You could need a larger conduit than if you were running separate conductors..
|
You suggestion is instead of using romex 6/3 just use 6awg Thhn? Can sub Thhn-feeds share the same conduit? Any other consideration using this configuration? Thanks
Last edited by GoyimPersuasion; 02-22-2009 at 11:02 AM.
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 01:51 PM
|
#9
|
|
You talking to me?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: sw mi
Posts: 5,407
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgsgww
I don't think it doesn't. Point is, why? You could need a larger conduit than if you were running separate conductors.
You can sleeve it through conduit for physical protection, in this situation, fill doesn't apply.
|
I would need to look in my '08 NEC (and of course that would need to be the applicable code in the OP's situation) but I seem to remember other pro's pointing this out. I don;t do resi so it isn't a big point to remember for me.
Not sure how far OP is considering running the NM in conduit and I believe a protective sleeve does not include an actual conduit run (even though it may be very short) If the conduit were connecting 2 boxes or such, I do not believe it would be considered merely a protective sleeve and therefor not allowed under the protective sleeve situation. (seems to be the situation the OP is suggesting)
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 02:31 PM
|
#10
|
|
Xtreme DIY'r
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South of Boston, MA
Posts: 17,248
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Where are you located?
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 03:31 PM
|
#11
|
|
DIY'er
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 2,030
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nap
I would need to look in my '08 NEC (and of course that would need to be the applicable code in the OP's situation) but I seem to remember other pro's pointing this out. I don;t do resi so it isn't a big point to remember for me.
Not sure how far OP is considering running the NM in conduit and I believe a protective sleeve does not include an actual conduit run (even though it may be very short) If the conduit were connecting 2 boxes or such, I do not believe it would be considered merely a protective sleeve and therefor not allowed under the protective sleeve situation. (seems to be the situation the OP is suggesting)
|
This is my understanding / interpretation as well. I belive what he is proposing is a violation.
Jamie
__________________
Jamie Dolan - Neenah, WI
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Need Help Uploading Photos? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. .
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 04:27 PM
|
#13
|
|
Xtreme DIY'r
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: South of Boston, MA
Posts: 17,248
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
I looked at conduit fill, from what I see a 2" conduit would work
6-3 .3318 (around a #4/0 for fill)
(3) #4
(1) #8 - ground?
Comes out to a 1.5" conduit
I still wouldn't run it, unless maybe I had the wire
With THHN it comes out to 1.25"
The bigger the conduit the more $$ all the fittings are
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 05:23 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,543
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
What I mean is that, if the conduit only is used lets say, down a concrete wall, from romex to romex than that is sleeving. If it is an actual connection from box to box, than fill does come to play.
I would just pull separate conductors, it is easy as that.
|
|
|
02-22-2009, 05:31 PM
|
#15
|
|
You talking to me?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: sw mi
Posts: 5,407
|
Sharing conduit (respect to code)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgsgww
What I mean is that, if the conduit only is used lets say, down a concrete wall, from romex to romex than that is sleeving. If it is an actual connection from box to box, than fill does come to play.
I would just pull separate conductors, it is easy as that.
|
I agree 100%.
|
|
|
-->
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|