 |
|
09-25-2012, 03:52 PM
|
#1
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
OK - I live in the Chicago area. I have an Bryant 100k BTU natural gas furnace that was installed in 1988. This summer i had to replace the blower motor capacitor, and yesterday I had to replace the 3-way gas switch. Since I have owned my house (5 years), the furnace has made a lound clicking sound when the furnace starts to heat up (after the call for heat but before the blow motor starts). No idea what that clicking sounds means, but I have a feeling that I am near the end of the life span for this furnace, or that numerous parts are going to start to go bad on me fast. Would you say that is a correct assumption?
I have gotten quotes for 80% and 95% replacement furnaces (100k BTU American Standard)
$3450 for the 80% installed
$4200 for the 95% installed
I have been told that after 5/13, 80% furnaced will no longer be available. I am kicking myself for not getting this last year so I could have taken advantage of the federal tax credits for 95% furnaces.
If you were in my shoes, what would YOU do?
A - keep my old furnace going
B - get a new 80% furnace while they still make them
C - get a new 95% furnace and start taking advantage of the cost savings ASAP
THANKS!
|
|
|
Warning: The topics covered on this site include activities in which there exists the potential for serious injury or death. DIYChatroom.com DOES NOT guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained on this site. Always use proper safety precaution and reference reliable outside sources before attempting any home improvement task!
09-25-2012, 04:34 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Near Philly
Posts: 1,955
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Whatever your avg bill for heating season has been, assume maybe a 15-20% reduction. That'll help figure out payback period of the $750 difference (and likely better comfort with a more modern model).
Your existing is nearly 25 years old and is at the point of replacement IMO especially with cost of fuel only to go up not down.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 05:57 PM
|
#3
|
|
An old Tradesmen
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 18,642
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Do a load calc, and find out what size furnace you really need. Your 1988 one is probably 40 to 60% over sized. A new correctly size 95% one will save you a lot of money and make you feel more comfortable in your home.
http://hvac-calc.com/
Its worth the 50 bucks.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 06:27 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 2,294
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Ditto on what the others said,get a correctly sized 95%. Don't put it off. That clicking noise could well be a large crack in the heat exchanger.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 06:32 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota - Latitude 45.057 Longitude -93.074
Posts: 3,326
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
I had a choice between installing either 80% or 90% as replacement for a old furnace that had a cracked exchanger.
I chose to go with an 80% Bryant of the right size because it was a good "fit" into the space and did not require a complicated combustion air and venting system that did not also require a lot of problems since both levels of the house were finished.
So far (after 3 years, I am satisfied and my maximum monthly heating costs (in MN) are much lower than my maximum monthly AC cooling costs.
I would expect a more complicated system such as a 90% furnace would require more expensive maintenance.
Dick
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 08:18 PM
|
#6
|
|
An old Tradesmen
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 18,642
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Quote:
Originally Posted by concretemasonry
I had a choice between installing either 80% or 90% as replacement for a old furnace that had a cracked exchanger.
I chose to go with an 80% Bryant of the right size because it was a good "fit" into the space and did not require a complicated combustion air and venting system that did not also require a lot of problems since both levels of the house were finished.
So far (after 3 years, I am satisfied and my maximum monthly heating costs (in MN) are much lower than my maximum monthly AC cooling costs.
I would expect a more complicated system such as a 90% furnace would require more expensive maintenance.
Dick
|
They actually don't. Main additional thing on a 90%plus is the secondary heat exchanger. No other mechanical or electrical devices are on a 90%plus that an 80% doesn't have.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to beenthere For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-25-2012, 09:43 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Toronto ON
Posts: 577
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
IMO It is not worth replacing furnace just for the added efficiency However , when you DO have to, (which is now) then, highest efficiency is a the clear choice!
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 09:45 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 3,184
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
stay with 95%....got an email that stated after may 2013 ...no more 80% furnaces will be sold..anyone else hear this......95% will save you more anyway....
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 09:55 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Almost Arkansas
Posts: 2,764
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Blotto
C - get a new 95% furnace and start taking advantage of the cost savings ASAP
THANKS!
|
Look at it this way...for every $100 you spend now on heating your home, $20 of that was wasted going up the chimney / flue.
A 95% will lower that to $5.
Adds up fast during Chicago winters. 
That is what I would do. And you have gotten nearly twice the life expectancy of your current furnace. Time to loosen the wallet.
__________________
Do you want it your way or the right way? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 10:33 PM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Toronto ON
Posts: 577
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Do furnaces only have a 15 year life expectancy now..they were always 20 -25 years not that long ago AND I have seen some furnaces (from the 50's) stll in service after 50 years of operation
So, what is current life expectancy of new 95% unit?
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 05:25 AM
|
#11
|
|
An old Tradesmen
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 18,642
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Average around 20 years for gas furnaces.
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 08:37 AM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Toronto ON
Posts: 577
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Thanks Beenthere..good to know.
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 09:29 AM
|
#13
|
|
I'm Your Huckleberry
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,067
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Quote:
Originally Posted by ben's plumbing
stay with 95%....got an email that stated after may 2013 ...no more 80% furnaces will be sold..anyone else hear this......95% will save you more anyway....
|
80% will only become the minimum after 2014 0r 2016 for the southern region.
__________________
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Doc Holliday For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-26-2012, 10:00 AM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 547
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ben's plumbing
stay with 95%....got an email that stated after may 2013 ...no more 80% furnaces will be sold..anyone else hear this......95% will save you more anyway....
|
80% furnace haven't been allowed in Canada for a couple of years now for retrofit, and even longer for new construction. Its only a matter of time before the states catches up.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hvac benny For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-26-2012, 03:55 PM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland (DC 'burbs)
Posts: 706
|
Replace my furnace now or later? 80% vs 95%? HELP
Well, if 80% gets phased out for retrofits that could cost folks a lot of $ in older homes that are not set up for the Cat IV venting requirements. To the extra $ for the 95% equipment costs one needs to add the potentially considerable cost of installing the vent and intake lines.
I upgraded my furnace last year and there was literally one spot that met the code for the vent location without having to run new PVC or stainless pipe up and out the roof through 3 levels of finished space. Doors, windows, inside and outside corners, vent pipe slope, height above snow line, etc, etc.... whew. It can be challenging, esp in multi family buildings like condos and townhomes that were not designed with Cat IV in mind. If I had to run the pipe out the roof I would have likely just opted for an 80% replacement.
__________________
Live long and prosper.
|
|
|
-->
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|