XPS Or EPS For Below-grade Use? - Insulation - DIY Chatroom Home Improvement Forum


Go Back   DIY Chatroom Home Improvement Forum > Home Improvement > Insulation

CLICK HERE AND JOIN OUR COMMUNITY TODAY...IT'S FREE!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2014, 11:00 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 146
Rewards Points: 113
Default

XPS or EPS for below-grade use?


I am preparing to start my footing insulation project but keep going back and forth about XPS vs EPS. A lot of people have told me to use XPS, but many sources seems to claim that EPS is more water-resistant and keeps more of its R-value over time when buried.

For example: http://www.concreteconstruction.net/...ulation_o.aspx



Either way, the foam boards will be touching sand, not dirt, and there will be drainage.

Advertisement

iLikeDirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2014, 08:04 PM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 81
Rewards Points: 93
Default

XPS or EPS for below-grade use?


http://www.buildings.com/article-det...s-and-xps.aspx

Pros and cons in that article.

I have always seen XPS recommended below concrete. If you also check out buildingscience, they always say to use xps.

Advertisement

cloves is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2014, 08:09 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 146
Rewards Points: 113
Default

XPS or EPS for below-grade use?


This won't be below concrete; it will be along the side of it. And that article doesn't really discuss the pros or cons of XPS vs EPS for below-grade use. I too have seen XPS discussed for below-grade use over at building science, but haven't found the reason. The study I linked to showed that XPS was more resistant to moisture dumps, but had more difficulty shedding what water it did absorb, while EPS was more permeable for both moisture accumulation and shedding.

Of course the R-Tech EPS panels I'd be using are all poly-faced and the open edges would be covered with more poly sheeting, so maybe it's moot.
iLikeDirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2014, 08:29 PM   #4
Member
 
concretemasonry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota - Latitude 45.057 Longitude -93.074
Posts: 3,824
Rewards Points: 2,136
Default

XPS or EPS for below-grade use?


That article used percentages to make EPS better than XPS. But they were only for idealized tests in lab. Note that REAL numbers were not shown and plastic protective "coating" is not proven. - Looks like a typical article posted in very close proximity to the ad for the product paid for by the prodcer of the "coated" product.

It may be OK for some applications, especially if you are into the "hair-splitting" R-value battle like the pink panther chooses to do and not get involved with the real world actuality.

Dick
concretemasonry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2014, 08:47 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 146
Rewards Points: 113
Default

XPS or EPS for below-grade use?


No, it was a real-world study: They investigated real footing insulations that had been in the ground for 15 years. Now, yeah, it's true that the study was done by ACH Foam, an EPS manufacturer. So it's possible this test was flawed, and it's possible that ACH is playing games with the numbers. But I'm inclined not to believe so, especially because [does some quick googling] in 2012, ORNL did basically the same test with XPS and largely replicated the results of moisture-laden foam exhibiting degraded performance, especially in the slab-on-grade foundation with poor drainage. They found that in this application, it got soaked and lost 44% of its R-value until they had dried it out, as it was unable to dry by itself.

I don't have a dog in the XPS vs EPS fight; I just want a cost-effective insulation foam that doesn't perform worse over time. Perhaps the real lesson I should be taking home is the importance of good foundation drainage to render the whole thing moot. In that case, I would be inclined to go with EPS simply because I can afford more of it!
iLikeDirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 12:51 PM   #6
Exterior Construction
 
Windows on Wash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Washington DC Metro Area (VA, MD, DC)
Posts: 7,100
Rewards Points: 3,256
Default

XPS or EPS for below-grade use?


I have always understood poly skinned XPS to be best but this doesn't seem to echo that assertion. Probably worth looking into.
Windows on Wash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2014, 10:53 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,983
Rewards Points: 2,032
Default

XPS or EPS for below-grade use?


More info for you; https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q...l4BOZHa4sAjM3g

http://archive.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ib...199/part3.html

http://docserver.nrca.net/pdfs/technical/317.pdf

Gary

Advertisement

__________________
If any ads are present in my answer above, I do not condone/support/use the product or services listed, they are there against my permission.
Gary in WA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Code concerning porch joists near grade Jim McC Building & Construction 10 06-17-2013 05:55 PM
Exterior wiring above and below grade for hot tub in Pennsylvania pkcrouse Electrical 0 05-31-2012 11:49 AM
Quick Q re: finished grade JayG Building & Construction 1 03-27-2010 05:49 PM
Insulating brick above & close to grade Peter Shepherd Building & Construction 1 09-16-2009 07:41 AM




Top of Page | View New Posts